handsomeness is subjective.
dopeness is not.
so obviously, if you're ugly, then just be dope.
stop worrying so much about the trivialities that occur with image-based interaction.
jeez, i'm vainer than most, but i'm also a believer in the dopeness as handsomeness angle....
i mean, if you aren't flavorful,
you aren't ever gonna get the hottness award from me, yo....
looks without substance, ya'll? nuh-uh. f* right off.
substance without looks? maybe. maybe not. depends on the degree of dopeness.
it just doesn't mean much if you're pretty.
i'm sayin': pretty lame, pretty good, pretty much not the best adjective in the thesaurus...
you have to bring the thunder, not just the hipster hairstyles.
being weird-looking, reppin' unconventional beauty, & unique personal styles are all way more
interesting than generic rippler muscle 'tards, and sparkle lip-gloss sleestaks...
ugly can be beautiful.
trying to fit into established standards can NEVER.
even when coupled with whatever image improving accesories are popular.
trying to fit in makes you look dumb.
every single time.
choose the wrench when you choose your wardrobe, when you do your hair, from when you wake up all the way until you fall asleep.
if beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then hold the 'b'....for berserker barbarian battle beast!
be ugly, and be dope.
word.
never sexy, never pretty.
i spit hot fire.
1 comment:
I was having a similar conversation with someone about this.
What if I choose the axe instead of the wrench? Is that a possibility? If not, I'll make it one.
I've chosen the axe once this week already.
--Holly
P.S. You have to click on my initials for an awesome link. Masters of the Universe for reals.
Post a Comment